|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[SMH, August 4, 2007]
Cathy Wilson (not her real name) is a sensible 25-year-old working two jobs to save for a deposit on a flat. On the MySpace website, however, you can discover another side to the eastern suburbs marketing manager and child-care worker. Alongside titillating photographs, Wilson says she is bisexual and reveals her general interests as "sex, sex on contiki, sex at work, sex at my mums house …" It then lists her personal details, including her home address and phone numbers.
The catch? Wilson's MySpace profile isn't Wilson's. It's a bogus profile, a case of identity theft that occurred last Saturday. Wilson became aware of it on Sunday, when eager young men started phoning, emailing, texting and turning up at her front door. She promptly notified MySpace, telling them to remove the profile. She also told police, who are investigating. "The internet's not safe," says Wilson, distraught that the profile had not been removed by yesterday.
Internet identity theft is an alarming new brand of stalking, harassment and defamation. It's what happens when MySpace becomes MyStalkerSpace. How common is it? Police are unable to give statistics about cases such as Wilson's. "It would be up to the individual police station [to keep track of reported incidents]," says a police spokesman. "That makes it difficult for us to collate these sorts of details."
MySpace, "a place for friends," has 3.8 million profiles in Australia; it's impossible to know how many are bogus. A MySpace spokesman, Darain Faraz, says even the site itself has no figure on how often identity theft occurs. "A profile will be taken down immediately, where people are pretending to be someone else," says Faraz. "And/or if it's defamatory or suggests violence. That's unacceptable."
It isn't just MySpace. There's also Facebook, which bills itself as a "social utility that connects you with the people around you". These sites allow people or groups to create identities and make cyberspace connections. "Almost everyone I know around my age has a MySpace or a Facebook account," says Wilson. "Lots of the young kids I babysit have MySpace profiles too. Surely that's not safe with all the pedophiles and crazies out there."
Given the popularity of such sites, horror stories are inevitable. Last year, Associated Press reported police were investigating whether up to seven girls aged 12 to 16 had been sexually assaulted by men they met on MySpace. In May, Melbourne 21-year old Tanya Maree Quattrocchi was ordered to serve 150 hours of community service after stalking and blackmailing American Idol star Diana DeGarmo. Quattrocchi bombarded DeGarmo with calls and text messages before hacking into her MySpace page and pretended to be her in emails she sent to the singer's family and friends.
An internet success story owned by News Corp, MySpace says it does not tolerate abuses such as identity theft. Its FAQ (frequently asked questions) page includes the question, "How do I report Identity theft, Underage User, Cyberbullying, Copyright Violation, to MySpace?" There follows the question, "Someone is pretending to be me -- what do I do?" The site responds, "In order to verify your identity, please send us a 'salute.' This means we will need an image of yourself holding a handwritten sign with the word 'MySpace.com' and your Friend ID … If the profile is an extremely obvious attempt to be cruel/false, you may not need to send a salute." A link follows for sending a message.
Wilson says she sent three messages on Sunday, but did not send a salute because the profile was obviously false. "I would never create a page like that," she says. "It's disgusting." Convinced the page was created by a former boyfriend, she is seeking an apprehended violence order. She says the suggestive, tongue-in-cheek photos were copied from an internet gallery reserved for close friends, which required a password to enter. The photos are suggestive, but not explicit. Music videos often show more flesh. It is the accompanying text that troubles her most.
"Hi boys," the profile says. "I'm out to have fun and meet as many of you as I can. PLEASE no serious relationships they only bore me." Wilson says police have been helpful, if occasionally perplexed. There is no specific law in NSW that targets identity theft, on the internet or elsewhere. Is it fraud? Harassment? It may be a matter for a civil action, such as defamation. All Wilson knows is that on Sunday she began receiving scores of unwanted phone calls, emails and text messages. "This can happen really easily," says Wilson, who has changed her mobile phone number and is in contact with the police. "Once you put any information on the internet, it's not safe. When I first saw the website on Sunday morning, I was distressed. I couldn't believe this could happen."
|
INFAMOUS AUSTRALIAN INTERNET PIRATE GETS 4 YEARS IN JAIL[SMH, AAP, June 24, 2007]Infamous Australian internet pirate Hew Raymond Griffiths was sentenced to more than four years in a US jail today. Griffiths, who once boasted he would never be caught, was extradited from Australia to the US in February. But the judge took into account almost three years Griffiths had spent in Australian jails while fighting extradition, meaning he will have to serve only 15 months. He was the leader of DrinkOrDie, the world's largest international internet piracy group. The US government today trumpeted the 51 month sentence handed to Griffiths and issued a warning to other piracy groups it would track down its members and send them to jail. "Whether committed with a gun or a keyboard - theft is theft," US Attorney Chuck Rosenberg for the Eastern District of Virginia said today. "And, for those inclined to steal Intellectual Property here, or from halfway around the world, they are on notice that we can and will reach them." Griffiths, 44, ran the internet ring from his home in Bateau Bay, on the NSW central coast. He was known by the screen name "Bandido," and as the leader of the international internet criminal group, DrinkOrDie, he was the mastermind behind the illegal reproduction and distribution of more than $US 50 million ($AU 59.11 million) worth of pirated software, movies, games and music. DrinkOrDie was founded in Russia in 1993 and expanded internationally throughout the 1990s. The group was dismantled by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement as part of Operation Buccaneer in December 2001, with more than 70 raids conducted in the US, the United Kingdom, Finland, Norway, Sweden and Australia. To date, Operation Buccaneer has resulted in more than 30 felony convictions in the United States and 11 convictions of foreign nationals overseas. Griffiths was sentenced today by US District Court Judge Claude M Hilton in Alexandria, Virginia. He had entered a guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to commit criminal copyright infringement. "From his home in Australia, Griffiths became one of the most notorious leaders of the underground internet piracy community by orchestrating the theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars in copyrighted material," US Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher said. "The Justice Department is committed to protecting intellectual property rights, and will pursue those who commit such crimes beyond the borders of the United States where necessary." DrinkOrDie specialised in cracking software codes and distributing the cracked versions over the Internet. Their victims included not only well-known companies such as Microsoft, Adobe, Autodesk, Symantec and Novell, but also smaller companies whose livelihood depended on the sales revenue generated by one or two products. Once cracked, these software versions could be copied, used and distributed without limitation. |
YOU DON'T WANT VISTA OEM? WELL STUFFU SAYS MICROSOFT[APC Magazine, April 12, 2007]Computer makers have been told they'll no longer be able to get Windows XP OEM by the end of this year, despite consumer resistance to Vista and its compatibility problems. By early 2008, Microsoft's contracts with computer makers will require companies to only sell Vista-loaded machines. "The OEM version of XP Professional goes next January," said Frank Luburic, senior ThinkPad product manager for Lenovo. "At that point, they'll have no choice." Despite Microsoft's relentless promotion of Vista, manufacturers are still seeing plenty of demand from customers for systems preloaded with XP, especially in the finicky SOHO market. In a recent post on its Direct2Dell blog, Dell reaffirmed to concerned customers that it wasn't about to force small business users -- who typically purchase PCs piecemeal, rather than in large enterprise-style orders -- to shift to Vista, which has experienced a less-than-stellar reaction from many buyers because of driver issues and moderately beefy hardware requirements. "Dell recognizes the needs of small business customers and understands that more time is needed to transition to a new operating system," the post read in part. "The plan is to continue offering Windows XP on select Dimension and Inspiron systems until later this [northern] summer." "From a local perspective, the post was a reminder more than an announcement," Dell ANZ corporate communications manager Paul McKeon told APC. "This was something we'd always planned during the transition phase since businesses will have different time frames to adopt the new OS. If you're a consumer, you're unlikely to be managing more than say 2.4 OS images at home, so it's less of an issue." There's general agreement amongst PC resellers that Vista has provided a minor boost to PC sales, but hasn't produced blockbuster numbers. A similar story applies in the retail space. Figures from marketing consultancy GfK suggest that after an initial sales surge, around 1500 copies of Vista are now being sold through Australian retailers each week, according to a recent report in the AFR. While Dell's post suggested it wouldn't be promoting Vista systems to the home market, manufacturers still have the option of selling XP-based systems for consumers this year. Read numerous comments about Vista from IT professionals HERE |
"SPAM KING" CHARGED WITH FRAUD, IDENTITY THEFT AND MONEY LAUNDERING[Washington Post, June 1, 2007]From his 17th-floor Seattle apartment overlooking Puget Sound, Robert A. Soloway allegedly ran an illicit network of computers around the world, secretly commandeering the machines of thousands of unsuspecting bystanders. Prosecutors say Internet users who clicked on infected e-mails and Web sites inadvertently took part in his criminal endeavor: spam. Soloway, 27, used his empire of hijacked "zombie" computers to send tens of millions of unsolicited e-mail messages over the past four years, prosecutors allege. Described as a spammer since he was a teenager, he allegedly covered his digital tracks using Chinese servers, fabricated Web sites and the purloined identities of hundreds of Internet users whose names and e-mail addresses were slapped on the bulk mailings. He opened and closed bank accounts faster than creditors could track them, prosecutors said. But federal authorities caught up this week with the man prosecutors call the "spam king" and arrested him on 35 charges of fraud, identity theft and money laundering, casting a light on the byzantine, highly lucrative underworld of mass e-mail marketing. Soloway pleaded not guilty. Federal authorities said computer users across the Web could notice a decrease in the amount of junk e-mail after Soloway’s arrest. Junk e-mail is most often distributed through the use of mass e-mailing programs and networks of computers infected by viruses, according to computer security experts. "He is one of the bad ones. He's one of the longest-running and uses criminal methods all the time," said John Reid, an investigator with Spamhaus, a European organization that fights spam. "Anyone on the Web for a while would have received one of Soloway's spams." Spamhaus had included him on its list of the 10 worst spammers until last year, when he was overtaken by more-sophisticated operators, primarily in Russia and Ukraine, Reid said. A lawyer for Soloway could not be reached for comment. Some forms of bulk commercial e-mailing are not illegal in the United States. Under the 2003 CAN-SPAM law, which regulates spam, bulk e-mail marketing is allowed if the sender complies with several conditions. Most notably, recipients must be allowed to opt out of the mailings, and the sender must be transparent about the source. Still, scores of big-time spammers have flouted the requirements. Prosecutors allege Soloway's company, Newport Internet Marketing, defrauded its customers in offering to send a high volume of legitimate e-mail marketing messages or to sell software that could be used in mass mailings. Neither approach performed as advertised but generated a torrent of spam. When customers complained, prosecutors said, Soloway refused to provide assistance or refund the sales, instead threatening to charge them additional fees and refer them to collections agencies. The scheme went far beyond a deceptive sales pitch, according to prosecutors, who say Soloway used fraudulent Internet practices to drum up customers for his business and then used them to send more spam. Soloway allegedly used a series of subterfuges to hide his identity and his reputation. Microsoft won a $7.8 million judgment against him in 2005 for sending e-mails that falsely appeared to come from MSN and Hotmail addresses. Although prosecutors say he has been living in a luxury apartment and driving a Mercedes convertible, Microsoft was never able to collect on the judgment because the company could not locate his bank accounts, Microsoft lawyer Aaron Kornblum said. In a separate case that year, an Oklahoma businessman won a $10 million judgment against Soloway for breaking the law regulating spam but was also unable to collect. Soloway allegedly masked his continuing involvement by using at least 50 Web site names and registering some of them through Chinese Internet service providers to conceal his involvement. Chinese authorities are less aggressive than their Western counterparts in policing their online service providers and responding to complaints, Internet security experts said. In at least one case, prosecutors said, he stole someone else's credit card information to register and pay for a Web site name. He also allegedly used proxy computers, called zombies or botnets, which were hijacked when the owners opened a software virus embedded an e-mail or Web link. Often, the owners did not realize their computers had been taken over. Though the indictment does not detail how Soloway first accessed the computers, Internet security experts explained that spammers often use secret online discussion groups to connect with hackers who lease out networks of zombie computers. Kathryn Warma, the assistant U.S. attorney handling the case, said Soloway used about 2,000 of these zombies at a time and, over the course of his activities, could have taken control of tens of thousands of machines. By using zombie computers and fake sender names, Soloway was able to ensure that most of his mailings could elude spam filters, prosecutors said. But Warma said this practice amounts to identity theft, and prosecutors are using identity theft laws for the first time to prosecute a spam case. She estimated that "hundreds or thousands" of people could have had their online identities stolen. "This was a great success by the Justice Department. But this guy is just going to be replaced by one or two or three people in Russia providing the same service," said Craig Sprosts, security analysis manager at IronPort Systems, which sells software for e-mail and Web security. The company reports that 70 billion spam messages are sent daily around the world, nearly double the volume a year ago. Junk e-mail is most often distributed through the use of mass e-mailing programs and networks of computers infected by viruses, according to computer security experts. |
[SC Magazine, June 4 2007]
More than 9,500 new infected web pages were detected every day last month, latest figures show. The report, compiled by Sophos, shows that the number of new malicious web pages discovered last month, has soared by more than 1,000 every day when compared to April. The research reveals that in total, 304,000 web pages hosting malicious code were identified in May. According to the research, the most prominent web-based malware last month was Iframe, accounting for almost two-thirds of all the web-based threats.
Iframe works by injecting malicious code on to legitimate websites, the anti-virus company said. “Attacks spreading on the web are becoming more frequent and more problematic for businesses every month,” warned Carole Theriault, senior security consultant at Sophos. “The real nasty attacks are most often found lurking on legitimate web pages," she added. "This is a wake up call for organisations with a website, being out of date with patches and running inadequate security has very real risks."
The research also found that China continues to host the most infected web pages, with more than half (53 per cent) of malicious web pages found in the Asian country.
China’s dominance can be attributed to increased reports of Iframe, which has been widely detected on unprotected web pages in the country, according to the research.
|
[Washington Post, May 16, 2007]
Iinternet provider AOL (America Online) announced yesterday it has bought Third Screen Media, a private company in Boston that specializes in placing ads on mobile phones, two weeks after Microsoft announced a purchase of a similar advertising firm.
Although mobile advertising remains in its infancy, the acquisitions by these two major technology companies underscore the mounting attraction this market holds for advertisers, wireless carriers and computer companies. So far, most of the marketing is in the form of banner ads displayed on Web sites designed for mobile browsing. But in the future, analysts say, advertisers could send text or graphical ads or even video commercials to cellphone users tailored to their interests and demographics.
During the next four years, the research firm eMarketer expects annual U.S. spending on mobile advertising to increase to $4.76 billion from $903 million. Worldwide spending is expected to reach $13.9 billion at the end of the same period.
John du Pre Gauntt, a senior wireless analyst at eMarketer, said the deal comes as more powerful cellphones are flooding the consumer market, creating opportunities for AOL and other Internet companies to introduce advertising on the devices.
"The fact they acquired Third Screen Media outright indicates how much urgency there is right now for big portals and big ad networks to have a fairly sophisticated, fully baked mobile component," he said. He predicted more deals involving mobile-ad firms in the coming months.
AOL's purchase of Third Screen Media aims to extend the services already offered by AOL's online ad network, Advertising.com, into this emerging market. It is the latest in a recent series of acquisitions by AOL as it tries to revive its flagging fortunes, an effort that has included shuffling its corporate leadership and opening its Internet portal to non-subscribers. "The acquisition of Third Screen Media gives us a very strong position in the fast-growing mobile space," Randy Falco, chairman and chief executive of AOL, said in a statement. Neither company disclosed the financial terms of the deal.
Joe Doran, Microsoft's general manager for digital advertising, said the United States is more than a year behind Western Europe in exploiting the mobile market. So Microsoft acquired ScreenTonic, a Paris company Doran says already has the technical expertise and specialized sales force. "ScreenTonic is making things happen in Europe that you just don't see in the U.S.," he said. That deal was announced early this month and is pending. No financial details have been provided.
Besides AOL and Microsoft, other major U.S. companies testing the mobile ad market include Verizon Wireless and Sprint, industry analysts say. Yahoo's newly revamped advertising program, called Panama, incorporates a mobile element. Google offers limited text ads on mobile phones in the United States and a dozen other countries. "Mobile advertising is where advertising on the Web was 10 or 15 years ago," said Roger Entner, senior vice president of the communication sector at IAG Research in New York. "In the early '90s, it wasn't reaching a lot of people."
Americans own more than 200 million cellphones, and many carry them constantly, making these devices a fertile market for advertisers if they can get over a series of technical and psychological hurdles.
Analysts said many consumers are likely to resent receiving ads on their phones unless they are relevant to their needs. Although advertisers could potentially tailor their offerings based on the personal information wireless phone companies keep about their subscribers, carriers and ad agencies have yet to resolve privacy concerns, said Linda Barrabee, a wireless analyst with the Yankee Group.
Another challenge is that cellphones have smaller screens than computers, requiring different ad designs. "We haven't seen a lot of things come together yet," Barrabee said. "It's the promise of these things that's really appealing."
|