![]()
Mourning At Tiananmen Square For Sichuan Earthquake Victims
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
[news.com.au, January 23, 2008]
US President George W Bush and other top officials issued almost one thousand false statements about the national security threat from Iraq following the September 11 attacks, according to a study by two not-for-profit organisations.
The Associated Press reports the study, published on the website of the Centre for Public Integrity, concluded the statements “were part of an orchestrated campaign that effectively galvanised public opinion and, in the process, led the nation to war under decidedly false pretences.”
According to the study, 935 false statements were issued by the White House in the two years after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. In speeches, briefings and interviews, President Bush and other officials stated “unequivocally” on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had links to al-Qaeda, or had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to get them.
“It is now beyond dispute that Iraq did not possess any weapons of mass destruction or have meaningful ties to al-Qaeda,” wrote the study’s authors Charles Lewis and Mark Reading-Smith. “In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003.”
The study found that President Bush alone made 259 false statements – 231 about weapons of mass destruction and 28 about Iraq’s links to al-Qaeda. The other officials named in the study are vice president Dick Cheney, then-national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, then-defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld, then-secretary of state Colin Powell, deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz and White House spokesmen Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan.
“The cumulative effect of these false statements – amplified by thousands of news stories and broadcasts – was massive, with the media coverage creating an almost impenetrable din for several critical months in the run-up to war,” the study concluded. “Some journalists – indeed, even some entire news organisations – have since acknowledged that their coverage during those pre-war months was far too deferential and uncritical. These mea culpas notwithstanding, much of the wall-to-wall media coverage provided additional ‘independent’ validation of the Bush administration’s false statements about Iraq.”
|
![]() |
[AAP, November 15, 2007]
The Crocodile Hunter may be gone, but a khaki-clad army of Steve Irwin fans kept his spirit alive today during celebrations in his memory. About 6000 people from around Australia and other countries – including the US, UK and Canada – crammed into Irwin's Australia Zoo on Queensland's Sunshine Coast for the first annual Steve Irwin Day.
Most donned Irwin's familiar khaki uniform, while some scrawled "crikey" across their bodies, strapped stuffed crocodiles to their heads and even dressed as khaki brides.
"The response worldwide has just been tremendous," Irwin's widow Terri said. "I think that what happened to Steve was such a tragedy, but it's given everyone the opportunity to take stock and re-evaluate what's truly important, and that has to be family and our wildlife. I think Steve would've been very proud, but I know he would've said, `It's about me crocs, mate, not about me'."
Irwin was killed in September last year when he was pierced in the heart by a stingray in far north Queensland. Terri Irwin, flanked by her children Bindi, 9, and Bob, 3, unveiled a life-sized bronze statue of the family at the site where the zoo began in 1970. The statue captures Terri, Bindi and Bob holding a saltwater crocodile, as Steve stands behind with his faithful dog Sui. "I think it's so special because our last trip together was catching crocodiles," Terri said.
Prime Minister John Howard paid tribute to Irwin in a pre-recorded video message at the zoo's Crocoseum, saying the Crocodile Hunter had left an "indelible mark" on Australia.
"We all miss Steve," Mr Howard said. "He was a larger-than-life individual who gave all of us a special and new way of thinking about the environment and all creatures great and small."
Bindi sang and danced her way through two new songs, one devoted to her dad, who she admitted she still missed. "But I know that I'm going to carry on with his work," Bindi said. Terri later officially launched her new book, My Steve, which she said was a journey of their life and love. But she said it also documented the difficult times, including the outcry when Irwin was condemned for holding his baby son Bob while feeding a crocodile in 2004.
"I think we fell desperately in love at first sight and it's kind of our journey through life together," she said. "He's the closest thing I've ever encountered to a real-life action hero."
Olivia Newton-John helped entertain the crowd, along with crocodiles, elephants, birds and snakes. "Khaki bride" Jill Tindal, 55, a local, said Irwin had been the inspiration for her volunteering to help injured animals. "That's how we can do our little bit," she said.
|
![]() |
CONTROVERSY AND FEAR AS ISLAM BECOMES VISIBLE THROUGHOUT EUROPE[The Christian Science Monitor, July 26, 2007]Wiesbaden, Germany - In the Rhine Valley city of Mannheim, the glittering minaret of Germany's biggest mosque overshadows what was once the region's most vibrant church, testifying to Muslims' new confidence as Christian churches are closing down. Years ago, 180 sisters of the Catholic order of the Sisters of the Divine Savior were the pulse of the city. Today, eight remain. Every weekend, roughly 150 Roman Catholics attend mass at the Liebfrauen Church, while up to 3,000 Muslims throng the Yavuz-Sultan-Selim mosque. Since the mosque was opened in 1995, Muslim shops and youth centers have become a magnet for the Muslim community. Mannheim is not unique. Across Europe, the Continent's fastest-growing religion is establishing its public presence after decades in basements and courtyards, changing not only the architectural look of cities, but also their social fabrics. Hailed by many as a sign of Muslim integration, the phenomenon is also feared as evidence of a parallel Islamic world threatening Europe's Christian culture. "Muslims have come out ... and have become visible," says Claus Leggewie, a political scientist at Germany's University of Giessen who wrote a study on the evolution of the mosque landscape in Germany. "By building expensive, representative mosques, they're sending a message: we want to take part in the symbolic landscape of Germany. We are here and we'll stay here." Major mosque projects from Cologne, Germany, to Amsterdam to Seville, Spain, have met with fierce opposition and fears that they will serve as breeding grounds for terrorists. Family members of two of the suspects in the Glasgow, Scotland, car bombings this month said the men had been radicalized by Tablighi Jamaat, an Islamic revivalist group with plans for an 18-acre complex near London's 2012 Olympic stadium that would house Europe's largest mosque. A local debate in Wiesbaden Such a structure is a far cry from the dark, cramped basement that hosted Halif Kuzpinar's Friday prayers for 33 years after he left his native Turkey to work on Frankfurt's roads. Then, the Muslim group he belongs to bought a vacant supermarket in a residential neighborhood of Wiesbaden, a city in central Germany. "There are parking spots. Children can come. There are better facilities for the youths," says Mr. Kuzpinar. "We want to build something nice so that people can come and see what we're doing." With a place of its own, Milli Gorus – an Islamic Turkish rights group watched by the German government – is looking for something it never had: public recognition in a country its members consider theirs. But it also ignited vehement protest. "This was to be sold as a supermarket, not as a mosque," says Wolfgang Kopp, who owns an apartment across the street. Along with other neighbors, he succeeded in, at least temporarily, stopping the parcel's rezoning for religious purposes. "Sooner or later there will be problems," he says. Under the German Constitution, all religious groups can have prayer facilities. While Muslims have had prayer rooms, says Klaus Endter, an ecumenical specialist for the Protestant Church in Hessen, "the question is ... whether a courtyard is the right place to exercise a religion." Guest workers worship more openly Since coming to Germany, Muslim migrant workers like Mr. Kuzpinar have held prayer meetings in dark nooks that reflected the precarious situation of a people often torn between their adopted and their home countries. But the "guest workers" who helped drive the economic boom of postwar Germany stayed. They set up organizations to run prayer, youth, and senior activities. They moved up the economic ladder, increasing their financial contributions to the groups, and receiving funds from pan-European Muslim organizations supporting the Muslim diaspora. And now, the third generation is building domed mosques with minarets. Only a handful existed 10 years ago, but today 159 mosques dot Germany today, with 184 under construction, according to the Central Institute for Islamic Archives in Söst. Aachen, for instance – a German city of 257,000 on the Belgian border with a 9 percent Muslim population – just gave the green light to a domed mosque with a minaret. That's a sign, says Mayor Jürgen Linden, "that Muslims have become a part and parcel of society." But many see the arrival of mosques as a threat, with fears and conflicts worsening since 9/11, argues Mr. Leggewie, the mosque specialist. Grass-roots initiatives have sprouted that try to thwart mosque projects. "I have the responsibility to protect our society, our democratic principles, ... our values," says Regina Ebenich, who leads an anti-mosque effort in Wiesbaden. Why, for instance, she asks, can't Muslim girls take part in swimming lessons or attend class field trips? "A mosque is never a religious place only," says Willi Schwend, head of the antimosque National Association of Citizens' Initiatives. "A mosque is a caldron of political agitation. The goal of Islam is to spread the principles of Islam into society, to change society, to bring about sharia [Islamic law]." Mr. Schwend's call finds an echo in eastern Berlin, where plans for a mosque with a 40-foot-high minaret have enraged a 6,500-inhabitant neighborhood. Although Berlin has numerous mosques, this would be the first in the former communist part of the country. There, argues Leggewie, the absence of a tradition of immigration, combined with strong right-wing feelings, explain why fears of Islam run deep. A conflict of cultures But even in Cologne, in the western part of the country, plans for what would become Germany's biggest mosque – with two 170-foot minarets slated to accommodate 2,000 people – has ignited a conflict of cultures. With more than 100,000 Muslims living in Cologne, Germany's fourth-largest city, many religious and political leaders have rallied around the mosque plan. But Ralph Giordano, a prominent writer and Holocaust survivor, rekindled fears of a radical Islam threatening German society. "The integration of Muslims has failed," Giordano told the media. Endter says Germany's mainstream population can no longer afford to ignore that it lives in a country of immigrants. "You can't say, on the one hand, "We invite you to work, come over,' and on the other hand say, "Yes, you can pray, but only in courtyards, basements, in the shadow of society,'" he says. "We are in a phase of upheaval. The Muslim communities want to integrate. They don't want to live in the shadow anymore." |
![]() |
SENIOR FRENCH POLITICIAN CHRISTINE BOUTIN JOINS RANKS OF 9/11 SKEPTICS[Reuters, July 08, 2007]A senior French politician, now a minister in President Nicolas Sarkozy's government, suggested last year that US President George W. Bush might have been behind the September 11, 2001 attacks, according to a website. The ReOpen911 Website which promotes September 11 conspiracy theories, has posted a video clip of French Housing Minister Christine Boutin appearing to question that Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda group orchestrated the attacks. Ms Boutin's office sought to play down the remarks. Asked in an interview last November, before she became minister, whether she thought Mr Bush might be behind the attacks, Ms Boutin says: “I think it is possible. I think it is possible.” Ms Boutin backs her assertion by pointing to the large number of people who visit websites that challenge the official line over the September 11 strikes against US cities. “I know that the websites that speak of this problem are websites that have the highest number of visits ... And I tell myself that this expression of the masses and of the people cannot be without any truth.” Ms Boutin's office sought to play down the remarks, saying that later in the same interview she says: “I'm not telling you that I adhere to that position.” This comment does not appear on the video clip on ReOpen911. Numerous other websites have also posted the clip in recent days and the story has started to seep into the mainstream media. “Christine Boutin snared by her controversial suggestions about September 11,” Le Monde newspaper said in a headline. Liberation newspaper quoted Ms Boutin's spokesman Christian Dupont as saying that she had not wanted to appear pro or anti-Bush at a time when Mr Sarkozy was being branded a “US poodle” after meeting the President in Washington. “And then she is not the foreign minister,” Mr Dupont added. France appears to be particularly fertile ground for conspiracy theories. In 2002, a book that claimed that no airliner hit the US Pentagon in the September 11 attacks topped the French bestseller lists. However, the French are not alone in their scepticism. According to a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll carried out last July, more than one-third of Americans suspect US officials helped in the September 11 attacks or took no action to stop them so the US could later go to war. The US State Department has rejected these accusations. Almost 3000 people died when hijackers crashed planes into New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. WEBMASTER'S COMMENT: Do the research and you will find that the evidence overwhelmingly supports the conspiracy theory. |
![]() |
[Story from foreignpolicy.com] A citadel is rising on the banks of the Tigris. There, on the river’s western side, the United States is building the world’s largest embassy. The land beneath it was once a riverside park. What sits atop today is a massive, fortified compound. Encircled by blast walls and cut off from the rest of Baghdad, it stands out like the crusader castles that once dotted the landscape of the Middle East. Its size and scope bring into question whether it is even correct to call this facility an “embassy.” Why is the United States building something so large, so expensive, and so disconnected from the realities of Iraq? In a country shattered by war, what is the meaning of this place?
For security reasons, many details about the embassy’s design and construction must remain classified. But the broad outline of its layout says a lot about one of America’s most important architectural projects. Located in Baghdad’s 4-square-mile Green Zone, the embassy will occupy 104 acres. It will be six times larger than the U.N. complex in New York and more than 10 times the size of the new U.S. Embassy being built in Beijing, which at 10 acres is America’s second-largest mission. The Baghdad compound will be entirely self-sufficient, with no need to rely on the Iraqis for services of any kind. The embassy has its own electricity plant, fresh water and sewage treatment facilities, storage warehouses, and maintenance shops.
The embassy is composed of more than 20 buildings, including six apartment complexes with 619 one-bedroom units. Two office blocks will accommodate about 1,000 employees. High-ranking diplomats will enjoy well-appointed private residences. Once inside the compound, Americans will have almost no reason to leave. It will have a shopping market, food court, movie theater, beauty salon, gymnasium, swimming pool, tennis courts, a school, and an American Club for social gatherings.
To protect it all, the embassy is reportedly surrounded by a wall at least 9 feet high—and it has its own defense force. The U.S. Congress has appropriated $592 million for the embassy’s construction, though some estimates put the expected building costs much higher. Once built, it could cost as much as $1 billion a year to run. Charles E. Williams, who directs the State Department’s Overseas Buildings Operations, proudly refers to it as “the largest U.S. mission ever built.”
But, the idea of an embassy this huge, this costly, and this isolated from events taking place outside its walls is not necessarily a cause for celebration. Traditionally, at least, embassies were designed to further interaction with the community in which they were built. Diplomats visited the offices of local government officials, shopped at local businesses, took their suits to the neighborhood dry cleaner, socialized with community leaders, and mixed with the general public. Diplomacy is not the sort of work that can be done by remote control. It takes direct contact to build goodwill for the United States and promote democratic values. Otherwise, there would be no reason for the United States to maintain its 250-plus diplomatic posts around the world.
The embassy in Baghdad, however, appears to represent a sea change in U.S. diplomacy. Although U.S. diplomats will technically be “in Iraq,” they may as well be in Washington. Judging by the embassy’s design, planners were thinking more in terms of a frontier outpost than a facility engaged with its community. “The embassy,” says Edward L. Peck, the former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, “is going to have a thousand people hunkered behind sandbags. I don’t know how you conduct diplomacy in that way.”
It is tempting to think that the Baghdad compound must be an anomaly, a special circumstance dictated by events on the ground in Iraq. But, while it is larger in scope than other U.S. embassies opening around the world, it is hardly unique. Since al Qaeda bombed the American missions in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, the State Department has been aggressively replacing obsolete or vulnerable embassies with ones designed under a program it calls Standard Embassy Design. The program mandates look-alike embassies, not the boldly individual designs built during the Cold War, when architecture played an important ideological role and U.S. embassies were functionally and architecturally open. The United States opened 14 newly built embassies last year alone, and long-range plans call for 76 more, including 12 to be completed this year. The result will be a radical redesign of the diplomatic landscape—not only in Baghdad, but in Bamako, Belmopan, Cape Town, Dushanbe, Kabul, Lomé, and elsewhere.
If architecture reflects the society that creates it, the new U.S. embassy in Baghdad makes a devastating comment about America’s global outlook. Although the U.S. government regularly proclaims confidence in Iraq’s democratic future, the United States has designed an embassy that conveys no confidence in Iraqis and little hope for their future. Instead, the United States has built a fortress capable of sustaining a massive, long-term presence in the face of continued violence.
Forty years ago, America was forced to flee a newly constructed embassy in Baghdad just five years after it was opened, when the United States broke off relations with Iraq after the 1967 Six Day War. Given the costs of the new compound, the United States would not likely part with its latest Baghdad embassy under almost any circumstances, including escalating violence. As much as the situation there may deteriorate—the fighting already includes missile and mortar attacks in the Green Zone—the biggest problem may not be the embassy’s security; indeed, it is the most impenetrable embassy ever built. Rather, the question is, with its high walls and isolation, will it be hospitable for conducting American diplomacy?
|
Home Sweet HomeInside the compound, staff will feel right at home. The complex will include a shopping market, beauty salon, movie theater, and American fast food. |
Mission ColossalThe main embassy building will include a central atrium and a rear portion housing classified offices, including the ambassador’s. Hundreds of non-diplomatic personnel from dozens of U.S. agencies will work in the annex building. The two office buildings will house about 1,000 employees |
Battle ReadyMarines will provide embassy security and live in their own separate barracks. The embassy grounds will be surrounded by high blast walls, which are all that most Iraqis will ever see of the U.S. Embassy. |
Compound CribsThe ambassador’s private residence will offer the most comfortable quarters. Lower-level employees will squeeze into 619 one-bedroom apartments |
US Criticised On Hiroshima Anniversary For Keeping Nuclear Weapons[Reuters, Agence France-Presse, August 7, 2007]Japan marked the 62nd anniversary of Hiroshima's atomic bombing with a solemn ceremony as the city's Mayor criticised the United States for refusing to give up its nuclear weapons program. Tens of thousands of elderly survivors, children and dignitaries gathered at the Peace Memorial Park yesterday, near ground zero where the bomb was dropped, to remember the 250,000 people who died. "Even to those who managed to survive, it was hell where they envied the dead," the Mayor of Hiroshima, Tadatoshi Akiba, told the crowd. In a speech followed by the release of 1000 white doves, he criticised the US for failing to halt nuclear proliferation. "The Japanese Government, which has the duty to work for the abolition of nuclear weapons through international law, should protect its pacifist constitution which it should be proud of, and clearly say 'No' to antiquated and wrong US policies," Mr Akiba said. The Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, after laying a wreath at the ceremony, said he would abide by Japan's pacifist constitution and decades-old non-nuclear policy. "As the only country to have suffered atomic bombings … we have the responsibility to hand down stories of this sad experience to the international community," he said. The anniversary coincided with the arrival of United Nations inspectors at the world's largest nuclear plant, which leaked a small amount of radiation following a powerful earthquake. Japan invited the team from the International Atomic Energy Agency, hoping to dispel concerns about risks from the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant. The six-member team will spend four days inside the seven-reactor facility, 250 kilometres north-west of Tokyo. |
|
"DEATHLY HALLOWS" IS FASTEST SELLING BOOK IN HISTORY[Reuters, July 23, 2007]The seventh and final volume in the Harry Potter series has become the fastest selling book in history, publishers said on Monday, with more than 11 million copies sold during the first 24 hours in three markets alone. U.S. sales of the eagerly awaited "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" hit 8.3 million, comfortably beating the previous Potter instalment, which posted sales of 6.9 million copies in the first day, U.S. publisher Scholastic announced. In Britain, Bloomsbury sold a record 2.7 million copies of the final Potter book in the first 24 hours, up from 2.0 million for "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince." The same company also announced nearly 400,000 copies of the English language edition of J.K. Rowling's story were bought in Germany over the same period. Thousands of Potter fans queued outside book stores in major cities around the world over the weekend to get hold of the book, which answers the questions on every reader's lips -- 'Who dies at the end?' and in particular, 'Does Harry survive?' In India, police said on Monday they seized hundreds of pirated copies of the cover of "Deathly Hallows" after raiding a printing press, storage depot and private home in Bangalore. Internet versions of the book also surfaced last week and two U.S. newspapers ran reviews before publication, but it was not enough to dampen enthusiasm for the last chapter of the boy wizard's increasingly bloody fight against the forces of evil. Lisa Holton, president of Scholastic Trade and Book Fairs, likened the weekend excitement in the United States to the hysteria that greeted the Beatles' first visit to the country. "This weekend kids and adults alike are sitting on buses, in the park, on airplanes and in restaurants reading 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows'," she said in a statement. Barnes & Noble Inc., the world's largest book retailer, sold 1.8 million copies of "Deathly Hallows" in the first 48 hours, while Borders Group Inc. sold around 1.2 million worldwide in a single day, both records for the outlets. "This isn't the end of Harry Potter by any means," said Steve Riggio, CEO of Barnes & Noble. "Barnes & Noble expects to sell millions of Harry Potter books over the next few years." RAVE REVIEWS Reviews of "Deathly Hallows" have been almost universally glowing, noting the darker tone of book seven in which several characters die. Critical reaction to the previous six Potter tales, which sold 325 million copies worldwide, has been mixed. Author of the Harry Potter books, Ms J. K. Rowling, 41, is likely to see her fortune swell further over the coming years. She is estimated to be worth 545 million pounds ($1.12 billion) already, making her the first dollar-billionaire author. In addition to the books, the first five Hollywood adaptations of her Harry Potter stories have amassed around $4 billion at the global box office. The final film in the franchise is slated for release in 2010. "After 608 crammed pages, it's still hard to believe it really is the end of the road for Harry," said Henry Sutton, books editor for the Daily Mirror tabloid in Britain. He believes that the epilogue at the end of book seven means there is "no possible return" for the Harry Potter saga, although not everyone agrees. Hours after the release of "Deathly Hallows", Ladbrokes bookmakers cut their odds on an eighth Potter tale to 10/1 from 16/1, following a flurry of bets. |
|
CIA AIRS ITS DIRTY LINEN[SMH, Los Angeles Times; The Washington Post, June 28, 2007]After fighting to keep them secret for more than three decades, the CIA has released hundreds of documents cataloguing some of the most egregious intelligence abuses of the Cold War, including assassination plots against foreign leaders and illegal efforts to spy on Americans. Triggered by the then-unravelling Watergate affair, and by fears that CIA involvement in that scandal would be exposed along with other illegal operations, the agency combed its files in 1973 for what it called "delicate" information with "flap potential." The result was a collection of documents the CIA called the "family jewels." The 702 pages were ordered released on Tuesday by the CIA Director, Michael Hayden, as part of what he characterised as an attempt to close an embarrassing chapter in the agency's history. The documents serve as "reminders of some things the CIA should not have done," he said. Mr Hayden took charge last year amid allegations that the intelligence community crossed legal lines by torturing terrorism suspects at secret prisons and by conducting warrantless surveillance involving Americans. His decision to release the family jewels, in response to a 1992 Freedom of Information Act request, was meant to convince critics that the agency embraces openness when possible. The documents describe secret CIA holding cells and the possibly illegal detention of a suspected Soviet spy who was held without trial at a CIA facility for years before it was determined he was a legitimate defector. They also reveal plans to eavesdrop on the international phone calls of American residents, and aggressive efforts to root out leaks of classified information to reporters. Watchdog groups praised the release, and said it was a remarkable step for a secretive organisation under no legal obligation to declassify the documents. Even so, the records are incomplete, with dozens of pages blacked out by CIA censors. One memo that lists the most damaging secrets contained in the family jewels is missing the first paragraph. A separate memo that is supposed to summarise the "unusual activities" of the CIA's domestic branch includes just three intact paragraphs followed by 17 blank pages. The records that are complete do not appear to contain major revelations of misdeeds, but provide extensive detail from internal accounts on episodes that have occupied Cold War historians for decades. Most are memos written by agency officials in response to a 1973 order from the CIA director, James Schlesinger, for employees to report activities they thought might violate the CIA's charter. The records shed light on the CIA's involvement in efforts to spy on Americans, including student anti-war activists, Black Power group leaders, Castro sympathisers and Soviet dissidents. CIA operatives worked with police to gather intelligence about groups that were planning protests at the presidential conventions in 1972. Anti-war activists were followed -- some all the way to Paris, where they met Viet Cong representatives. The surveillance turned up financial connections between John Lennon, described only as "a British subject," and a project linked to the anti-war activist Rennie Davis. As part of an effort to combat drug trafficking, the CIA asked the Department of Agriculture to plant a field of opium poppies in Washington State to be used to test "photo-recognition systems" designed to detect illicit crops from overhead. But the agency refused a request from federal authorities to use infrared scanners to locate moonshine stills. The documents also describe a panicked internal investigation to find out whether the CIA might be implicated in the Watergate scandal, which led to Richard Nixon's resignation as president. Howard Hunt, who organised the Watergate break-in, was a former CIA agent, as was James McCord, one of the "plumbers" arrested during the attempted bugging of the Democratic Party headquarters. The CIA director, Richard Helms, ordered agency officials to report all contacts with Hunt and McCord. The inquiry did not turn up any evidence that implicated CIA officials. But one official reported getting a call from Hunt in 1972, months before the break-in, asking for a referral of "a retiree or resignee who was accomplished at picking locks." The documents also portray a CIA obsessed with coverage that was negative or simply too accurate. |